SEO

How to make a viral video – a 5-step guide

1. select a product that is a low consideration product (e.g. a song) whose primary missing link is awareness

2. create a funny and entertaining video that features that product or a key attribute of the product

3. [ contact us for the "secret sauce" of step 3 ]

4. continue to build the momentum and build further social amplification by real people (won’t happen if the content is not funny, entertaining, useful, or unexpected)

5. use analytics to determine how to further optimize the content itself to match what characteristics actually went viral (based on how people talked about it when they passed it along)

Examples of videos whose viral effects were successfully manufactured over time. Obama Girl; Lonelygirl15 Brea Olson; Notice the shape of the stats curve of the more recent lonelygirl15 video from 2008. It is much flatter, which is a characteristic of non-viral videos. This is after they revealed that the original lonelygirl15 was a fake; now they have to support the view count through traditional paid media and continuous PR to accumulate the views.

obama-girl-viral-video

lonelygirl15-brea-viral-video

lonelygirl15-recent-non-viral-video

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009 SEO, search, social networks 2 Comments

Digital Orchestration

digital orchestration means helping clients orchestrate and coordinate the activities of agencies that have particular specialties — search engine optimization (SEO), search engine marketing (SEM), website design and build, analytics, social marketing, etc. Too often, clients are not comfortable asking about digital or don’t know enough to tell if the agency specialists are recommending the correct strategy or tactic.

search consultants typically help individual clients find individual agencies that are good at a particular area — e.g. TV agency, digital agency, SEO agency, etc.  Today, this is no longer as effective because the different disciplines and specialities need to work closely together and feed off of each other to work properly.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, July 30th, 2009 SEM, SEO, digital, integrated marketing No Comments

The Perfect Babe – Megan Fox (pics)

Megan Fox  – The Perfect Babe Product Placement

megan-fox-1 megan-fox-2 megan_fox_covers_june_2009_ellemegan-fox-babemegan-fox-pink-strapless-dress

No, this post is not about Megan Fox. Well, yeah it is.  But it’s about the MARKETING of Megan Fox.

Megan Fox has been around in films and TV since 2001 (see filmography below).  But it wasn’t until 2007 when she starred in the first Transformers movie that she burst on the scene and became an overnight mega celebrity, especially online (see Google Search Volume chart).  If you look at Ford’s search volume during the same period, there was NO lift in search that was detectable — there probably was some lift, but it is simply not detectable.

So Megan Fox went from very very little awareness to not only massive awareness, but also massive demand — people remembered her name and even took action (performed searches on her name). If some product placements would have had only 10% of the success of the “megan fox” product placement, they might actually justify the immense cost a bit better (millions of dollars paid by the advertiser to the movie makers to place products into the storyline of the movie).

And why is she “perfect,” in the marketing sense, of course? Her search volume has not only sustained but also continued to grow. She was not a flash in the pan that went away after the advertising/media dollars stopped or the public interest died off (see the snuggie and etrade search volume charts below).

megan-fox-search

ford-search

snuggie

etrade-baby

megan-fox

transformer girl, second girl in transformers, other girl in transformers – Isabel Lucas

isabel-lucas-transformer-girl

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 SEO, Uncategorized, metrics 3 Comments

Microsoft Kumo vs Wolfram Alpha – FIGHT!

Microsoft should take a page from the launch of Wolfram’s Alpha using social channels.

Wolfram Alpha – 1.6 million google search results

Microsoft Kumo – 624k google search results

wolfram-alpha-search-resultskumo-search-results

www.WolframAlpha.com is launched, but Microsoft Kumo.com is not even launched. So there is NO benefit from all the news coverage.

wolfram-compete

wolfram-referrals

wolfram-links

Search intensity and volume indicates interest of users — Wolfram Alpha is kicking Microsoft butt.

search-intensity

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/wolfram-alpha-veil-lifted/

http://gizmodo.com/5240514/wolfram-alpha-and-google-tested-head+to+head

http://gizmodo.com/5236115/wolfram-alpha-search-engine-on-video

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Hulu’s superbowl halo

search volume actually stayed up after the Superbowl jump

hulu

Tags: , , , ,

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009 SEO, analytics, trends No Comments

small company kicking big brands’ butt with SEO and SEM

almost 10X the search keywords driving traffic; 52,200 pages indexed by Google, and nearly 13X the monthly unique visitors.  And they started in Mar 2007. 

Top Keywords Driving Traffic to:
• dailymakeover.com
 
see all 1,335 keywords
• covergirl.com
 
see all 230 keywords
• maybelline.com
 
see all 189 keywords

 

Use This Data: Embed Graph | Export CSV | Show Permalink
Date: 01/2009 People Month Δ   Year Δ   What is this?
 dailymakeover.com 3,888,546 1.9% N/A The number of people visiting a site.
See Full Description
 covergirl.com 303,846 27.2% 34.2%
 maybelline.com 70,669 -27.1% -37.8%
 makeoversolutions.com 9,717 -49.7% -99.3%

Tags:

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009 SEM, SEO, integrated marketing, marketing No Comments

modern users are impatient

Comparing the 2008 and 2005 Google Heat Map Studies:

Source: Think Eyetracking, September 2008

In 2005, they would look down the page at the results. By 2008, users glance at the first 3 – 4 results and then refine their search. They’d sooner type in a “long tail” search than go to page 2 of the results.

Monday, February 23rd, 2009 SEO, digital, marketing No Comments

long-tailers are more savvy and engaged

evidence that people who type long-tail keywords are more engaged and spend more time on site…

Compare “head” keywords which drive traffic to Apple.com (e.g. iTunes drives 7.1% of the site’s traffic) versus “long tail” keywords which drive traffic to MobilOil.com (e.g. “mobil1 turbo diesel truck”).  The time index of these long tail keywords are far higher than the time index of the head terms.

Apple.com  (Source: Compete.com)

 Top 25 Search Keywords driving MOST VOLUME to Apple.com

Volume Rank

Keyword

% of Site’s Search Traffic

Average Time Index

1

itunes

7.1

3.1

 

2

apple

4.2

3.4

 

3

apple store

2.4

3.5

 

4

ipod touch

1.6

2.7

 

5

itunes download

1.6

3.5

 

6

iphone

1.5

2.1

 

7

ipod

1.5

2.9

 

8

quicktime

1.1

3.4

 

9

apple.com

1.1

4.0

 

10

itunes store

0.9

3.9

 

11

ipod nano

0.7

2.5

 

12

itunes.com

0.7

4.0

 

13

i tunes

0.6

3.1

 

14

apple ipod

0.6

4.5

 

15

apple trailers

0.5

3.7

 

16

www.itunes.com

0.4

5.5

 

17

ipod shuffle

0.4

2.2

 

18

mac

0.4

2.3

 

19

movie trailers

0.4

3.6

 

20

itouch

0.4

1.9

 

21

download itunes

0.3

2.3

 

22

www.apple.com/ipod/start

0.3

4.0

 

23

apple computers

0.3

4.4

 

24

www.apple.com

0.3

4.7

 

25

safari

0.2

1.5

 

Mobiloil.com  (Source: Compete.com)

Top 25 long tail terms which lead to HIGHEST TIME INDEX (people spending time on the site)

Volume Rank

Keyword

% of Site’s Search Traffic

Average Time Index

49

engine run in +luricants

0.58

100.0

188

power steering bubbles and growls

0.15

88.1

201

synthetic transmission fluids

0.13

85.7

152

ram enterprises

0.19

78.7

112

mobil 1 turbo diesel truck 5w-40

0.30

75.5

53

half axle replacement

0.56

69.0

135

mobil one oil filters miles

0.24

59.6

136

mobil synthetic

0.24

59.6

153

how to change a cv joint

0.19

57.6

113

cleaning throttle body

0.30

55.6

19

www.mobiloil.com

0.91

55.0

202

vin devers sylvania oh

0.13

47.7

203

mobile 1 oil company .com

0.13

47.7

204

2000 s500 mercedes transmission fluid rating

0.13

47.7

91

is it bad to mix oil with synthetic oil

0.38

46.4

16

mobil 1 online rebate

0.98

45.3

29

mobile 1 oil

0.77

43.9

168

recommend synthetic oil change

0.17

43.1

94

mobil 1 5w30

0.37

41.1

98

extended life, mobil 1

0.35

38.2

122

mobile one oil vs regular oil

0.27

36.7

123

mobile one oil

0.27

36.7

59

where to buy mobil one 0w 30 synthetic

0.52

35.3

15

how do i change differential oil

1.00

35.3

169

mobil 1 racing oil

0.17

35.0

166

long wearing tires

0.18

32.9

183

mobile 1 mx4t motorcycle oil

0.16

30.8

78

mobile one oil change interval

0.42

28.4

127

what is a throttle body

0.26

27.6

103

what to use to clean valve cover

0.34

27.5

88

mobile oil rebates

0.38

26.8

63

mobile one

0.50

26.4

104

mobiloil.com

0.34

26.4

14

mobil oil filters

1.04

25.9

150

zddp mobil 1

0.19

25.9

83

how to replace shocks

0.41

25.7

143

www.mobil1.com

0.21

25.3

Tags: ,

Monday, February 23rd, 2009 SEO, digital, integrated marketing No Comments

EMOT – electronic moment of truth

during the customer’s journey down the “purchase funnel” from awareness through consideration to the purchase, there can be many moments of truth. For modern consumers, who spend a large portion of their day online, or at least “connected” via a mobile device, many of these moments of truth are “electronic” – in other words, electronic moments of truth – EMOTs. Understanding EMOTs through the purchase funnel can lead to greater efficiencies in advertisers’ marketing programs to drive customers expeditiously through the funnel. 

For example, when a customer goes online to do research – an EMOT electronic moment of truth — if they can’t find you, you don’t exist.  Many many factors contribute to being “findable” online. Proper search engine optimization (SEO) can ensure a brand has web pages that show up near the top of the results on the first page of search engine results. Also, using brand names that are not common words like “open” (american express small business brand) or “tag” (male deodorant from P&G) means they can more easily be found. For example GE’s “ecoimagination” or Subway’s “footlongs.”  (see “made-up words” post) are easily found. 

Other EMOTs could include a person standing on the street (in New York City) and needing a restaurant recommendation in the vicinity, immediately! They use their mobile device and search for restaurants in the area around their current GPS location. When they search on their mobile device, if the website is not mobile compliant and does not display properly or cannot be used by a primitive mobile browser (no graphics, no javascript, no flash, etc.) the user would not be able to find what they are looking for. So this EMOT was a FAIL for the customer. 

The brands  that will be the most successful are the ones who can deliver value at every EMOT of their target customer. If the customer goes online to search and research, the brand’s information should be findable – even better, the specific bit of information being sought should be findable. If the customer needs recipe help while standing in the store (”what ingredient or how much should I buy?”) the information should be findable, specifically through a mobile device.  Ultimately by delivering value at each EMOT, brands can answer customers’ missing links and thus efficiently move the customer down the purchase funnel towards the purchase.

Tags: ,

Saturday, February 21st, 2009 SEO, digital, integrated marketing, marketing No Comments