advertising

Popular Posts – Week of June 7, 2010.

  • HP Mini 311 Nvidia ION Netbook Hackintosh’ed
  • Facebook advertising metrics and benchmarks
  • Contextual Help Bubble – Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia, Amazon, Google Translate, Clip2Send
  • How-To View Gmail for iPad on Your Regular Computer – Chrome and Safari
  • A sure sign Facebook’s already in trouble – meteoric rise and meteoric fall coming
  • What is Web 3.0? Characteristics of Web 3.0
  • social media benchmarks
  • Apple vs Microsoft vs Sony [Graphs]
  • The JKWeddingDance video was real; the viral effect was MANUFACTURED – Post 1 of 2
  • Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 Uncategorized No Comments

    Made-Up Word Advertising — “Retina Display” — is how Apple Launches New Products

    A made-up word “retina display” had every major blog and news outlet scrambling to help explain what it was. Nearly 1.1 Million search results in 19 hours. It was covered on every evening news; look closely at the thousands of related news articles, etc.  And all the major, powerful sites like Gizmodo, MacRumors, Engadget, etc. covered the event.  Similarly 1.2 million search results on the “one more thing” feature — video calling on the iPhone called FaceTime. All entirely free primetime coverage — talk about the tens of millions of impressions achieved with NO media cost — they can definitely used the money saved to ensure Steve Job’s next keynote will have sufficient WiFi bandwidth for all those live blogging the event.

    Look at the following graph of relative search volume. The spike in search volume for All-You-Can-Jet (in red) is about 4X higher than the orange line (Footlongs). And the blue line for “retina display”  is 8X. Consider the cost of the paid TV media campaign supporting Subway’s Footlongs compared to the cost savings of the social media launch of JetBlue’s All-You-Can-Jet Pass and the no cost media for Apple.

    retina display launch search volume Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    Of course, not all companies will achieve the same mass coverage, but the techniques for product launches can be the same. Footlongs is an expensive paid media campaign by Subway and note how low the orange line is compared to the TWO no-cost launches.

    And one more graph that shows Drobo plus 2 social media success stories — Groupon and FourSquare that even blow away Apple’s retina display — all for FREE.

    drobo groupon foursquare search volume Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    apple retina display iphone 4 Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    Other notable examples of using made-up word advertising include JetBlue’s All-you-Can-Jet Pass and Subway’s Footlongs. Further details about JetBlue’s launch of the All-You-Can-Jet Pass is here – http://go-digital.net/blog/2009/08/jetblue-all-you-can-jet-pass/

    all you can jet footlongs search Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    Earlier unfiltered results on Google within 10 hours of launch — there are 3.9 Million results which will be de-duped overnight.

    retina display search results Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    Day 1 Stats – page 1 position 3 in 44.6 million results

    made up word advertising Made Up Word Advertising    Retina Display    is how Apple Launches New Products

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 Branding, integrated marketing 1 Comment

    Source: http://gizmodo.com/5534285/how-much-tech-companies-are-spending-on-advertising

    How Much Tech Companies Are Spending On AdvertisingYahoo’s reportedly ponying up $85 million for an upcoming ad campaign—nearly twice as much as they spent on advertising in all of 2009. But as this chart shows, Yahoo’s wager looks puny next to Microsoft’s massive ad spending.

    According to Kantar Media, who provided Silicon Alley Insider with numbers for total ad spending (print, online, radio, tv, and outdoor), Microsoft spent some $518 million on advertising last year, over twice as much as Apple did, with $249 million. And I’m not entirely sure they got their money’s worth—I’m having a hard time thinking of much recent Microsoft propaganda besides those “make a PC for under $1000″ commercials, which basically seemed like Best Buy spots anyway. Update: also, this.

    Of these six companies, eBay spent the biggest chunk of their revenue on self-promotion, presumably trying to keep their name prominent even as they lose members to services like Craigslist. And equally interesting to how much money Microsoft and eBay spent is how little Google did. I guess life is good when you’re a verb. [SAI]

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Sunday, May 9th, 2010 charts No Comments

    Stop paying Kim Kardashian $10,000 per tweet – She’s NOT Influential if no one re-tweets

    Source:  AdAge.com

    Yahoo Scientist Questions ROI of Kardashian’s Sponsored TweetsDuncan Watts Explains His Model for Predicting Value of Influencers on Twitter

    Ad Age Digital Conference

    NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — Stop paying Kim Kardashian $10,000 per tweet. That’s the recommendation based on the work of Yahoo’s principal research scientist Duncan Watts, who presented his findings at Advertising Age’s DigitalConference.

    “If you recruit enough people who, on average, influence just one other person, you could get a much better return on investment if you aggregated them and altogether paid them a tenth of what Kardashian gets.”

    But in looking at influencers, Mr. Watts found that it’s incredibly hard to predict who will be a major factor on Twitter, a conclusion that runs counter to the prevailing wisdom of social epidemics popularized by the book “The Tipping Point.” While he acknowledges there are certain personalities such as Kim Kardashian who can potentially trigger a larger cascade of re-tweets given her large amount of “followers” (“Tipping Point” enthusiasts call her a connector), close studies of social platforms reveal that influence is spread more efficiently and more reliably when done through many-to-many connections, rather than through a few highly connected individuals.

    “Most of them will send tweets, and no one else re-tweets,” Mr. Watts said. “A lot of times, not that many people are listening on Twitter.”

    More supporting details here: http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/celeb-twitter-followers-have-low-authority-13297

    Celeb Twitter Followers Have Low Authority

    sysomos logo Stop paying Kim Kardashian $10,000 per tweet   Shes NOT Influential if no one re tweets

    While celebrities have high numbers of Twitter followers, those followers usually have minimal reach and influence, according to social media consulting firm Sysomos.

    Celebrity Followers Offer More Quantity than Quality
    Celebrities seem to have large amounts of followers with low Twitter authority levels (see “About the Data” for more information on how authority levels are determined). Of five celebrities examined, the average follower of President Barack Obama had the highest authority rating on a scale of 0 to 10, 2.4. The most common authority score among Obama’s roughly 4.2 million followers is 1, held by 20%.

    sysomos-twitter-celeb-june-2010.jpg

    Interestingly, the celebrity whose fans had the second-highest authority score of 2.1, pop singer Lady Gaga, had the second-lowest following of about 4.5 million. The most common authority score of followers of all celebrities except Obama was 0.

    Actor Ashton Kutcher had the highest number of followers (about 5.1 million), and the third-highest average authority score (1.8). Pop singer Britney Spears had the lowest average follower authority score (1.3) and second-highest number of followers (about 4.8 million).

    Celebrities seem to have large amounts of followers with low Twitter authority levels. This could be because they attract everyone from all walks of life. Some people may only be on Twitter to see what their favorite stars have to tweet about. In addition, most celebrity followers tracked by Sysomos had few followers themselves, pushing down their authority scores.

    Social Media Heavyweight Followers Have Most Authority
    Social media heavyweights, private citizens who have made a name for themselves on Twitter, had the fewest followers but the highest average authority scores for their followers. Following the pattern seen with celebrity tweeters, the social media heavyweight with the fewest followers, Jason Falls (27,195), had the highest average follower authority score (4.8).

    sysomos-twitter-heavyweights-june-2010.jpg

    Conversely, the two social media heavyweights with the most followers, Chris Brogan (139,693) and Jeremiah Owyang (64,775), tied for the lowest average follower authority score of 4. The most common authority score for all social media heavyweight followers was either 4 or 5.

    Online Media Beats Traditional Media
    On the whole, the five news/media sources tracked by Sysomos show more variety among their scores than the celebrities or social media heavyweights. However, online media sources attracted fewer followers with higher average authority scores than traditional media sources.

    sysomos-twitter-newsmedia-june-2010.jpg

    Online media source Read Write Web, with about 1 million followers, had an average follower authority score of 3, which was also its most common follower authority score (19%). This tied online media source Mashable in average authority score, most common authority score and percentage of followers with the most common authority score. Mashable has more followers with about 2 million.

    Online media source Tech Crunch ties traditional media source Time.com with an average follower authority of 2.4 and most common follower authority score of 2, at virtually the same percentage. However, Time.com has significantly more total followers (2.1 million) than Tech Crunch (1.4 million).

    Traditional media source New York Times has the highest total number of followers (about 2.5 million) and lowest average authority score (2.2). It also has by far the lowest most common authority score of 0 (22%). Not surprisingly, sources that specialize in social media attract users that are more active on Twitter.

    Facebook Fans More Valuable Customers
    While there is variation in the value of different types of Twitter followers, on the whole Facebook fans of a brand provide more value as customers than non-fans, according to a new study from digital consulting firm Syncapse Corp.

    The average value a Facebook fan provides a brand is $136.38, but it can swing to $270.77 in the best case or go down to $0 in the worst. This value is based on Syncapse analysis of five factors per fan: product spending, brand loyalty, propensity to recommend, brand affinity and earned media value.

    On average, a Facebook fan participates with a brand 10 times a year and will make one recommendation. Value can differ significantly by individual brand. For example, in the case of Coca- Cola, the best case for fan value reaches $316.78 but is $137.84 for an average fan. In the worse case scenario, a fan is worth $0.

    About the Data: Using its social media monitoring and analytics platform, Sysomos looked at the authority rankings of five celebrities, five social media heavyweights and five media organizations. Rankings were based on the kind of Twitter users following these celebrities, social media heavyweights and media organizations. Each Twitter user is assigned an authority ranking between 0 to 10 – with 10 signifying someone with very high reach and influence. This authority ranking is based on the number of followers, following, updates, retweets and several similar measures used by Sysomos.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Tuesday, May 4th, 2010 analytics 1 Comment

    Android Phones Surpass iPhone in Web Traffic

    Source: http://lifehacker.com/5525578/android-phones-surpass-iphone-in-web-traffic

    Android Phones Surpass iPhone in Web TrafficAccording to data collected by mobile advertising network AdMob, Android phones have surpassed the iPhone in mobile traffic—at least in terms of ads served to the devices, which is a pretty good measure for overall traffic. As mobile browsers account for more and more of our online time, it’ll be interesting to see how the OS distribution works out. [TechCrunch]

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Wednesday, April 28th, 2010 statistics No Comments

    TV Ad Revenues Drop 12% Online ad revenues grew 8% from 2008 to 2009

    With the greater efficiencies of digital, the overall “pie” will shrink because fewer dollars are needed to achieve the same effect. In other terms — for every DOLLAR pulled out of traditional and general advertising, 20 – 50 CENTS is put back into “digital” channels and tactics. Thus the overall pie will continue to shrink while some parts grow and other parts shrink dramatically.

    wasted ad dollars TV Ad Revenues Drop 12% Online ad revenues grew 8% from 2008 to 2009

    Source: http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/magazine-ad-revenues-pages-fall-in-q1-2010-12574

    pib logo2 TV Ad Revenues Drop 12% Online ad revenues grew 8% from 2008 to 2009

    Ad pages also declined in Q1 2010 compared to Q1 2009, falling 9.4%, according to the Publishers Information Bureau (PIB).

    Source: http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/tv-ad-revenues-drop-12-12613/yankeegroup-media-averages-apr-2010jpg/

    yankee group logo TV Ad Revenues Drop 12% Online ad revenues grew 8% from 2008 to 2009

    Total US TV and online advertising revenues dropped 12% in 2009, although online revenues independently grew, according to research from The Yankee Group.

    TV Revenue Decline Worse than Expected
    In 2009, the total US TV and online advertising market totaled $67 billion, compared to $77 billion in 2008. TV advertising, by far the largest portion of this combined market, was hit especially hard by reductions in spending during 2009.

    The TV ad market declined 21.2%, from $52 billion to $41 billion, between 2008 and 2009. This was significantly more than the 4% (or roughly $2.1 billion) decline The Yankee Group originally forecast in June 2009. As highlighted below, a shift in consumer attention primarily drove the steep decline in the TV ad market.

    TV’s Loss is Internet’s Gain
    Internet advertising grew during 2009, as a result of consumers spending more time online and less time watching TV. Online ad revenues grew 8.3% between 2008, when they totaled $24 billion, and 2009, when they totaled $26 billion.

    yankeegroup media averages apr 2010 TV Ad Revenues Drop 12% Online ad revenues grew 8% from 2008 to 2009

    Media Consumption Dwindles
    The total amount of time consumers spent on media per day actually declined 14.3% between 2008 and 2009. Consumers spent about 14 hours per day on media in 2008, but only 12 hours per day in 2009. Most of the decline in media consumption was represented by declining TV viewership.

    Americans spent an average of three hours and 17 minutes per day consuming TV and video in 2009, compared to an average of four hours and 13 minutes a day consuming online content. In addition, average daily mobile phone use reached one hour and 18 minutes. Thus Yankee Group advises marketers and advertisers to increase their focus on online and mobile promotions.

    Annual US Ad Spending Falls 12.3%
    Total US advertising expenditures (including print, radio, outdoor and free standing inserts) fell 12.3% in 2009, to $125.3 billion, as compared to 2008, according to Kantar Media.

    Some of Kantar’s findings echo findings from the Yankee Group. Internet display advertising expenditures increased 7.3% for the year, aided by sharply higher spending from the telecom, factory auto and travel categories. Meanwhile, spot TV advertising fell 23.7%, Spanish language TV advertising dropped 8.9%, network TV fell advertising 7.6%, and cable TV advertising only fell 1.4%.

    About the Data: Statistics are taken from the updated Yankee Group “2009 Anywhere Advertising Forecast.”

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Thursday, April 15th, 2010 news, statistics 1 Comment

    Amazon Runs Away With Retailing Pt. II (AMZN)

    Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-amazon-sales-vs-retail-2010-4

    button more charts
    button chart prev button chart next

    We’ve updated our chart demonstrating Amazon’s amazing retail growth.

    When last we looked Amazon was running away with retail sales compared to competitors. Today, it’s sprinting away with it.

    We used the first quarter of 2003 as our base, then took a look at the growth in sales from Amazon, E-Commerce, and offline retail sales.

    chart of the day, amazon, e-commerce, retail sales, 2003-2009

    Follow the Chart Of The Day on Twitter: www.twitter.com/chartoftheday

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Thursday, April 15th, 2010 news No Comments

    Adobe says iPhone / iPad adoption and ‘alternative technologies’ (cough, HTML5) could harm its business

    Source: http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/09/adobe-says-iphone-ipad-adoption-and-alternative-technologies/

    flash player10 04 06 2010 Adobe says iPhone / iPad adoption and alternative technologies (cough, HTML5) could harm its business

    Adobe might continue to crow about Flash and its importance on both the desktop and mobile devices, but there’s no lying to investors, and the company is pretty blunt about the threat of the iPhone and iPad in the end-of-quarter Form 10-Q it just filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: it flatly says that “to the extent new releases of operating systems or other third-party products, platforms or devices, such as the Apple iPhone or iPad, make it more difficult for our products to perform, and our customers are persuaded to use alternative technologies, our business could be harmed.”

    Now, Adobe has to make doom-and-gloom statements in its SEC filings — it also says that slowing PC sales or a failure to keep up with desktop OS development could harm its business — but the timing is crazy here, since just yesterday Apple changed the iPhone OS 4 SDK agreement to block devs from using the upcoming Flash CS5 iPhone cross-compiler to build iPhone apps. What’s more, Apple’s also using HTML5 for its new iAd platform, which could potentially undo Flash’s stranglehold on online advertising as well. Yeah, we’d say all that plus the recent push for HTML5 video across the web — and from Microsoft — could harm Adobe’s business just a little. Better hope that final version of Flash Player 10.1 is everything we’d hoped and dreamed of, because Adobe’s going to have to make a real stand here.

    Adobe says iPhone / iPad adoption and ‘alternative technologies’ (cough, HTML5) could harm its business originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink post label VIA Adobe says iPhone / iPad adoption and alternative technologies (cough, HTML5) could harm its businessBusinessWeek  |  post label source Adobe says iPhone / iPad adoption and alternative technologies (cough, HTML5) could harm its businessAdobe Form 10-Q  | Email this | Comments

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Saturday, April 10th, 2010 news No Comments

    ‘we tried to buy a company called AdMob’

    Source: http://www.engadget.com/2010/04/08/steve-jobs-we-tried-to-buy-a-company-called-admob/

    iphone os 4 0294 rm eng we tried to buy a company called AdMob

    We’d previously heard rumors that Quattro Wireless was Apple’s consolation prize after a deal with bigger mobile advertising rival AdMob fell through, and Steve Jobs confirmed it on no uncertain terms at the Q&A session following today’s iPhone OS 4.0 event: “we tried to buy a company called AdMob… but Google snatched it away.” Indeed they did, though that deal hasn’t yet been approved by the Federal Trade Commission while Apple’s already up, up and away with its iAd solution, so it seems like everything shook out for the best — if you’re an iPhone developer, anyway.

    Steve Jobs: ‘we tried to buy a company called AdMob’ originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:41:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink |   | Email thisComments

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Thursday, April 8th, 2010 Uncategorized, news No Comments