CTR
it’s a simple matter of supply and demand. Let’s do a thought exercise.
1. eMarketer forecasts that retail e-commerce will grow roughly 10% per year for the next few years. This means that the total “pie” of people spending online will only grow by an average of 10% per year. Note that sales is (or should be) the goal of advertising. So that’s why we are looking at e-commerce sales and comparing it to online advertising because both are completed in the same medium and we can eliminate cross-media uncertainties and breakdown of tracking.

2. online advertising is still exploding with trillions of pageviews per month, thanks to social networks which throw off ungodly numbers of pageviews when people socialize with others. The Compete chart below shows the top social networks which rely on banner advertising (impression-based advertising) to make revenues. Notice that just Facebook and Myspace alone generate 115 BILLION pageviews a month. And if you consider that Facebook shows 3 ads per page, that would be 250+ BILLION impressions per month served by Facebook alone. Furthermore, the rate at which pageviews grow is 250% – 1,000% per year, depending on the site in question.

3. In the online medium, we have end-to-end tracking from the advertising (banner impression) through to the sale (e-commerce). The banner is served (impressions); a percent of users click on it to go to a site (click through rate – CTR); a percent of those make their way through the site and end up completing a purchase online (conversion rate). Those users who are looking for something and who are considering buying something will be online searching and researching. Those are the ones who are likely to click on banner ads, compared to others who are online to do something else, like write email, socialize with friends, etc. And if the purchase is their ultimate end-goal (to make a purchase) we have a farily reliable indicator of the growth in not only such interest but also the completion of the task — namely, e-commerce, which grows at 10%.
4. Now, if the number of people who will click grows that 10%, but the number of advertising impressions grows at a slow 250%, the ratio of clicks to impressions drops dramatically because the denominator is growing 25X faster than the numerator. Serving more ads simply will not get the amount of e-commerce to grow significantly faster. The point of diminishing returns has been reached and passed, so incremental ad impressions are ignored and useless. The number of people who will end up buying will not increase significantly faster. And given the tough economic climate the amount of sales may actually decline before it goes up again.
5. If we generalize this back to all retail commerce, it grows at an EVEN slower pace than ecommerce. When you compare this to the dramatic increase in ad impressions and the shift from traditional channels (TV, print, radio – whose impressions and audience sizes are dwindling) to online channels (portals, news sites, social networks – whose impressions and audience sizes are skyrocketing) again the ratio of sales to available advertising drops dramatically. This is a measure of the effectiveness of advertising (sales divided by advertising spend). It was already small — it sucked — and it will get dramatically smaller soon — it’ll suck more soon.
A way to mitigate this “sucking” is to peg advertising expenditures on a success metric which is an indicator of user intent — cost per click — versus a traditional indicator of reach and frequency — ad impressions served — which from the above is NOT an indicator of consumers’ intent to purchase. This way, advertisers only pay when someone clicks. Those “someones” click when they are looking for something and are more likely to complete a purchase than those who don’t click.
“CPC banner advertising” anyone?
Tags: ad impressions, advertising, amount, audience, average, banner, banner ads, banner advertising, banner impression, BILLION, breakdown, chart, click through rate, Compete, completion, conversion, conversion rate, cost per acquisition, cost per pageview, CPC banner advertising, cross media, CTR, demand, denominator, ecommerce, economics, eMarketer, end, exercise, exercise 1, Facebook, goal, growth, impression, impressions, indicator, intent, interest, make, matter, medium, month, myspace, notice, number, online, online marketing, page, percent, pie, purchase, question, rate, ratio, ROI, sale, simple matter, site, social networks, something, spending, supply, supply and demand, task, tracking, trillions, uncertainties, way, year
UPDATED: January 19, 2013
Facebook Sponsored Stories CTR, CPC Benchmarks
ORIGINAL POST:
Many clients have asked about social media benchmarks or social marketing benchmarks. They ask things like how many fans should they have on Facebook? They are concerned if they cannot project 1 million fans on their fan page.
But that is because most clients are coming from a reach and frequency background. Some have moved to unique visitors, pageviews, and time on site. But what is more important today is not that people get to the site or the time they spend, but what they do … so social intensity is a benchmark which captures the quantity and frequency of social actions like sharing, discussing, commenting, voting, etc. All of these actions lead to value that accumulates for other future visitors to the site.
Adwords – lower cost per click
Clicks Impressions CTR Avg Cost per Click Total spent
511 61,894 0.82% $0.47 per click $242.16
PayPerPost – optimal is lowest payment per post
dollars pageviews/clicks
$122.50 2630/120 $1.02 per click 4.6% CTR ($5 per post)
$183.25 1324/114 $1.61 per click 8.6% CTR ($10 per post)
$291.25 2369/260 $1.12 per click 11% CTR ($20 per post)
ReviewMe – www. johnchow. com
$300 – nearly no value; JohnChow pioneered link sharing to get his blog up to about rank 100 on Technorati before they changed the way they calculated authority; despite the many links to his blog, it was practically useless in driving any useful customers. Now his site has been penalized by Google and is only PageRank 3 site.
StumbleUpon – extremely useful in helping new users discover the site and features; the velocity of the clicks was incredible (approx 300 clicks in 5 minutes) BEST VALUE OVERALL flat rate $0.05 per click; you set the daily budget
Facebook benchmarks like Facebook CTRs, Facebook CPCs, and Facebook CPMs can be found here.
Tags: "benchmarking the value of a facebook fan", "facebook ads" why is ctr low, 1 million, 511, ads cpm average 2010 price, Adwords, adwords benchmarks, adwords click rate benchmark, adwords ctr, approx, authority, average click through rate facebok ads, average click through rate for facebook ads, average cost of Facebook ad, average CPC facebook, average CPCs, Avg, background, benchmark, benchmark ad clicks, benchmark page views, benchmark social media, benchmark social media links, benchmarking facebook, benchmarking for social media, benchmarking social media, benchmarks, benchmarks for social media, benchmarks social networks, BEST, blog, branded video ads facebook cpm, budget, cannot, Clicks, clicks to impressions benchmark, com, cost, cost per click, cpc avergae, CPCs, cpm ctr cpc, CPMs, CTR, CTR facebook ads, ctr in facebook, CTR youtube ad average, CTRs, difference between conversions and actions fa..., Digital Benchmarks, digital marketing, DIGITAL MARKETING $20 per month, digital marketing solutions, display advertising benchmarks, effectiveness of facebook ads, Facebook, facebook ad campaign performance, facebook ad click rate, facebook ad click through rate, facebook ad clicks, facebook ad ctr ratio, facebook ad effectiveness, facebook ad rates cpm, facebook ad specs, facebook ads click through rate, facebook ads cost effective?, facebook ads cpm rates, facebook ads effectiveness, facebook ads impressions or clicks, facebook ads low ctr, facebook advertisers, facebook advertising costs, facebook advertising cpc, facebook advertising ctr, facebook advertising effectiveness, facebook advertising effectiveness 2009, facebook advertising media rates, Facebook advertising metrics, facebook average click through rate 2009, facebook average stay 2010, facebook benchmarks, facebook click average cost, facebook click through rate, facebook click through rates, facebook cpc ctr, facebook CTR, facebook ctr average rates, facebook ctr rates, facebook metrics, fan, fan page, frequency, google, impressions, intensity, izea, JohnChow, link, marketing, online ad click through rate benchmarks, online advertising cpc benchmarks, online display ads ctr benchmarks, optimal, OVERALL, page, PageRank, pageviews, payment, PayPerPost, payperpost benchmarks, post, project, project 1, quantity, rank, rate, reach, ReviewMe, search advertising benchmarks, setting benchmarks in social media, site, social actions, social benchmarks, social marketing, social marketing benchmarks, social marketing metrics, Social Media Ad Metrics, social media benchmark, social media benchmarking, social media benchmarks, social media marketing benchmarks, social media metrics, social networks, social-metrics, StumbleUpon, stumbleupon advertising, stumbleupon cpc, Technorati, the average price for click throughs CPC, the social network benchmark, time, today, unique visitors, value, velocity, viral content benchmarking, voting, way, web 3.0 benchmark, what is a facebook ad ctr, what is a good ctr rate in facebook, what is the average click through rate for li..., what is the average CTR for contextual ad, what's the avrage conversion rate on a facebo..., whats a good click through rate facebook, www, xxxx